May 15, 2007 2:00 AM PDT

Gonzales proposes new crime: 'Attempted' copyright infringement

Posted by Declan McCullagh
  • Font size
  • Print

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is pressing the U.S. Congress to enact a sweeping intellectual-property bill that would increase criminal penalties for copyright infringement, including "attempts" to commit piracy.

"To meet the global challenges of IP crime, our criminal laws must be kept updated," Gonzales said during a speech before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington on Monday.

The Bush administration is throwing its support behind a proposal called the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007, which is likely to receive the enthusiastic support of the movie and music industries, and would represent the most dramatic rewrite of copyright law since a 2005 measure dealing with prerelease piracy.

Here's our podcast on the topic.

The IPPA would, for instance:

* Criminalize "attempting" to infringe copyright. Federal law currently punishes not-for-profit copyright infringement with between 1 and 10 years in prison, but there has to be actual infringement that takes place. The IPPA would eliminate that requirement. (The Justice Department's summary of the legislation says: "It is a general tenet of the criminal law that those who attempt to commit a crime but do not complete it are as morally culpable as those who succeed in doing so.")

* Create a new crime of life imprisonment for using pirated software. Anyone using counterfeit products who "recklessly causes or attempts to cause death" can be imprisoned for life. During a conference call, Justice Department officials gave the example of a hospital using pirated software instead of paying for it.

* Permit more wiretaps for piracy investigations. Wiretaps would be authorized for investigations of Americans who are "attempting" to infringe copyrights.

* Allow computers to be seized more readily. Specifically, property such as a PC "intended to be used in any manner" to commit a copyright crime would be subject to forfeiture, including civil asset forfeiture. Civil asset forfeiture has become popular among police agencies in drug cases as a way to gain additional revenue, and it is problematic and controversial.

* Increase penalties for violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's anticircumvention regulations. Criminal violations are currently punished by jail times of up to 10 years and fines of up to $1 million. The IPPA would add forfeiture penalties.

* Add penalties for "intended" copyright crimes. Certain copyright crimes currently require someone to commit the "distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period of at least 10 copies" valued at more than $2,500. The IPPA would insert a new prohibition: actions that were "intended to consist of" distribution.

* Require Homeland Security to alert the Recording Industry Association of America. That would happen when CDs with "unauthorized fixations of the sounds, or sounds and images, of a live musical performance" are attempted to be imported. Neither the Motion Picture Association of America nor the Business Software Alliance (nor any other copyright holder, such as photographers, playwrights or news organizations, for that matter) would qualify for this kind of special treatment.

A representative of the Motion Picture Association of America told us: "We appreciate the department's commitment to intellectual-property protection and look forward to working with both the department and Congress as the process moves ahead."

What's still unclear is the kind of reception this legislation might encounter on Capitol Hill. Gonzales may not be terribly popular, but Democrats do tend to be more closely aligned with Hollywood and the recording industry than is the GOP. (A few years ago, Republicans even savaged fellow conservatives for allying themselves too closely with copyright holders.)

On behalf of Rep. Howard Berman, the California Democrat who heads the House Judiciary subcommittee that focuses on intellectual property, a representative said the congressman is reviewing proposals from the attorney general and others. The aide said the Hollywood politician plans to introduce his own intellectual-property enforcement bill later this year but that his office is not prepared to discuss any details yet.

One key Republican was less guarded. "We are reviewing (the attorney general's) proposal. Any plan to stop IP theft will benefit the economy and the American worker," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the top Republican on the House Judiciary committee. "I applaud the attorney general for recognizing the need to protect intellectual property."

Still, it's too early to tell what might happen. A similar copyright bill that Smith, the RIAA and the Software and Information Industry Association enthusiastically supported last April never went anywhere.

CNET News.com's Anne Broache contributed to this blog.

Declan McCullagh, CNET News' chief political correspondent, chronicles the intersection of politics and technology. He has covered politics, technology, and Washington, D.C., for more than a decade, which has turned him into an iconoclast and a skeptic of anyone who says, "We oughta have a new federal law against this." E-mail Declan.
Recent posts from News Blog
Was InfoWorld's CTO of the Year award a year late?
VMWare VI4 renamed to vSphere
Red Hat's new support product demonstrates subscription value
Teen listens to iPod during brain tumor removal
NASA, Google Maps track Southern California wildfires
Sprint first to offer HTC Touch Pro
Flipping out: RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 debuts
Sprint HTC Touch Diamond outed early
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 106 comments
Typical
by adlyb1 May 15, 2007 4:32 AM PDT
With all the serious issues we have in front of us at this time, this is what the White House and the AG are working on...

It's going to get to the point where you will spend more time in jail for sharing a song than robbing a bank.

Sad, really sad.
Reply to this comment
Economic damages must be stopped at all costs!
by raveneye74 May 15, 2007 4:50 AM PDT
I wonder what economic damages will be caused when people shy away from the purchasing of technology because they are uncertain if they are going to face life in prison for using it?

I for one will sleep much better at night knowing that the already over-taxed Homeland Security Department will be *required* to spend resources tracking unauthorized recordings instead of keeping terrorists from crossing our borders.

This is yet another example of lobbying money hard at work for the good of we the...we the...um...people?; through making the economy stronger?; yeah, it's a good thing...

When will the government finally stop being controlled by corporate interests? (hint: when political campaigns are no longer funded by corporate interests) See that happening anytime soon?
Reply to this comment
Holy crap!
by ethana2 May 15, 2007 4:55 AM PDT
I want this guy out of my nation's government. Now.
I'm one of those who refuses to abide any proprietary software or DRM. Put me in a concentration camp already. Man. Someone's gonna be sure to encrypt his hard drives, keep a steady open wireless hub, and move to Sweden. You want to see fascism in action? This is it.

ethana2@gmail.com
Reply to this comment
new crime...
by smithjones May 15, 2007 5:30 AM PDT
How about making it a crime to be the head of your department,
and not know whats going on with the firing of your personel
because of politics? What do you charge him with..., stupidity, or
incompetence for job performance? Gonzales, stop trying to shift
attention away from your poor performance, by trying to make
another obscure law, that takes the heat off you.
Reply to this comment
Thought Police
by Exspook May 15, 2007 6:07 AM PDT
Something doesn't follow (logically)...,
"It is a general tenet of the criminal law that those who attempt to commit a crime but do not complete it are as morally culpable as those who succeed in doing so."
How do you define an 'attempt' to commit a crime such as 'infringement'? Wouldn't the prosecutor have to establish the 'goal' or 'purpose' of the crime yet uncommitted? I mean if you walk into a bank with a gun and a note it's fairly straightforward to infer what was going to happen, but "infringement"? How will they determine whose life they are going to tear apart? WHO are they after? Does AG work for the RIAA or something now?

And by the way, MY tax-dollars are going to pay for this? If corporate America wants to farm out it's security enforcement to the government, at least they should pay a fee or something.
Reply to this comment
1984....
by ddesy May 15, 2007 7:22 AM PDT
1984 is currently in use as the Republican playbook. Watch everything that anyone does, arrest people based on what they might be thinking of doing, lie about what happened and insist things were always the way the latest story says, etc...

We need to get these people out of office now! Anyone who cannot see this has got to be anti-America!
Stop giving money to the RIAA
by trapilales May 16, 2007 7:18 AM PDT
Only one way to stop these lunatics. Stop buying their music.
For every CD from a major label that you buy they get a cut of money which they in turn use to sue people or buy politicians to pull this crap.

Stop buying their products and funding them.

Buy music from independent artists or download it online...yes i'm advocating piracy.

I refuse to give any money to the RIAA or any artist that supports them.
View reply
Someone from the RIAA must be performing oral sex on Alberto Gonzales
by wangbang May 15, 2007 6:25 AM PDT
What a waste of time and resources...
Reply to this comment
*blink*
by thedreaming May 15, 2007 6:34 AM PDT
What the FRAK?! Who moved the rock?! Attempted Copyright Infringement?! You've got to be kidding!!

I love the part about who now Homeland Security now is going to inform the RIAA of "Attempted" Copyright violations!

The best one is the one where they call for life in prison for using priated software that ends in the death of a person! "Yeah, I used windows and my brother died, so I"m in jail and my new friend Fred says I'm pretty!" HA!

This is just stupid on so many levels...
Reply to this comment
SW is more than just your friggin MP3 player
by baike May 15, 2007 7:50 AM PDT
Imagine an airline startup uses pirated software for flight avionics, software fails - plane crashes - 180 people dead. Do you think someone should go to jail for that?

There is more to life than your PC. Software is everywhere. Did you drive to work this morning? Traffic lights are controlled by software. The fuel air mixture in your car's engine is controlled by software. The brakes on your car for christ's sake have software controls. And actually the brakes in the semi behind you on the highway are controlled by software - what if that software is a pirated copy with serious flaws? What if it fails?

Wake up and look past your DVD collection!!
View all 3 replies
SW is more than just your friggin MP3 player
by baike May 15, 2007 7:50 AM PDT
Imagine an airline startup uses pirated software for flight avionics, software fails - plane crashes - 180 people dead. Do you think someone should go to jail for that?

There is more to life than your PC. Software is everywhere. Did you drive to work this morning? Traffic lights are controlled by software. The fuel air mixture in your car's engine is controlled by software. The brakes on your car for christ's sake have software controls. And actually the brakes in the semi behind you on the highway are controlled by software - what if that software is a pirated copy with serious flaws? What if it fails?

Wake up and look past your DVD collection!!
View all 3 replies
Wait til they steal your software or book
by j-rischard June 13, 2007 3:02 PM PDT
It's easy to be a smart-alec when it's someone else' software or book that's pirated. But, if you ever do anything worthwhile like create a book or code that's worth pirating, you'll fell differently about it when it's stolen.
Life imprisonment for using pirated software..?!?!
by imacpwr May 15, 2007 6:37 AM PDT
Oh come on, that's an absolutely asinine sentence..!!!!
As if the prison population isn't overflowing already now you want
to lock up maybe 20% of the American population..???
Reply to this comment
read the article
by baike May 15, 2007 7:39 AM PDT
If it leads to someone's death - yes. Do you realize how many times our lives are placed in the control of computers. Ever been on a plane? a cruise ship? ever been to the hospital? had surgery? ever serve in the military? Whenever my life is in the control of software, I want to be confident that there are penalties for people who cheat and put me at risk. Consequences for fraudulent work that result in deaths is a serious crime already. This is just including software piracy in that category of fraud.
View all 7 replies
More prisoners means MORE $$$
by Exspook May 15, 2007 6:57 AM PDT
I suspect that the incredible profits being raked in by the privatized jails and prisons in this country are just not enough. Now we have the system preparing to prosecute (at our expense) people for transgressions of thought. I bet our prison-owning corporations are grinning ear-to-ear.

PS - Hey Alberto, ever hear of the term 'cruel and unusual'?
Reply to this comment
BINGO!!! DING DING DING!
by RocRizzo May 15, 2007 1:39 PM PDT
You hit the nail right on the head.
Many of today's prisons are privatized. If the prisons themselves are not privatized, services to those prisons are certainly privatized.

The corporate buddies of Bushco, Inc. are part and parcel of this. Thinking Blackwater here.

Why do we let people run our country who think that government can do no good?
Prison Farming
by Renegade Knight May 15, 2007 7:11 AM PDT
Some laws only create more prisoners out of perfectly good people. This smacks of that.

The largest copyright infringers on the planet can't even go to prison. Ever seen a corporation behind bars? Didn't think so.
Reply to this comment
The master plan
by kpruppel May 15, 2007 10:06 AM PDT
An Ayn Rand character explained it decades ago. Government's job is to keep creating laws until eventually, everyone is a criminal. Then, they can exert complete and total control, because everyone can be arrested for something. I've been watching it continue for years, and it seems unstoppable, because people still don't get it..
life for attempted cronyism?
by Button Boy May 15, 2007 7:23 AM PDT
Hey Gonzales, how about a life sentence (at hard labor) for firing those state's attorneys whose only sin was being too honest?

WOW- this guy has really lost his sense of morality if he is going to push through this big booster for the RIAA.
Reply to this comment
Thanks to RIAA & MPAA murder has less punishment
by bobby_brady May 15, 2007 7:42 AM PDT
The RIAA and MPAA payoffs at work!
Reply to this comment
Thanks to RIAA & MPAA murder has less punishment
by palewook May 15, 2007 7:57 AM PDT
Gonzales needs to go.

We need to pass a law that anyone who is convicted of selling legislation for PACs which injures the public's well being or circumvents the bill of rights will do life with no parole.
View reply
Murder might violate the DMCA!
by hadaso May 15, 2007 2:13 PM PDT
As copyright terms are based on the life of the author (plus an ever changing fixed extra term) taking the life of an author might be considered as an act of removing a mechanism designed to protect intelectual property!
got liberty?
by ColdMast May 15, 2007 7:59 AM PDT
Corporations have more Rights than Citizens is it still a Democracy or Fascism.

I wonder if plagiarism will be punishable by death?
no one would write. {for fear of repeating}

What about the VCR?

The same old question about the loaf of bread;
If someone uses pirated software prevent poverty, should that be a crime, maybe teaching the homeless or jobless new work skills but one pirated software. - no good dead goes unpunished.
In society they are the haves and the have nots; The Managers and the Toilet Scrubbers.

What if a medical software company unknowingly violates a copyright, does any one who has every used that software have to go to jail for life imprisonment.

It seems that the purposed law is more interested in protecting corporations right to make money than liberty.

Don't be afraid, that is what your government wants you to feel; when you fear you don't think and you don't question.
Reply to this comment
This proves it
by PzkwVIb May 15, 2007 8:05 AM PDT
The Yes-man General is officially an idiot.
Reply to this comment
This proves it
by PzkwVIb May 15, 2007 8:05 AM PDT
The Yes-man General is officially an idiot.
Reply to this comment
WTF
by Hardrada May 15, 2007 8:09 AM PDT
09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
Reply to this comment
YES THE NUMBER!
by ColdMast May 15, 2007 8:36 AM PDT
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=121866&page=6
I WANT MY RIGHT TO LETTERS AND NUMBERS
THEY'RE HUMAN INVENTIONS AND PUBLIC DOMAIN!

Fear is the mind killer.
- Frank Herbert, Dune
WTH is "attempting to infringe copyright"
by palewook May 15, 2007 8:21 AM PDT
if you look at an image via a google image search that isnt authorized by the rights owner to be hosted on the current site?

is this like starting your car and getting an attempted speeding ticket before you pull out of your driveway?

how do you find someone guilty of a crime that hasn't been committed.

seriously, defining a true legal nature of "attempting" is a gray area. we aren't talking about a true physical area where attempting is someone at the door of a building prying it open for illegal entry. this is a property rights area that will extend into imagined boundaries of code. and crossing those 1's and 0's without any true act or intentional act of copyright violation, will occur daily.
Reply to this comment
George W. Bush is the AntiChrist
by geekpro May 15, 2007 8:40 AM PDT
.

www.bushisantichrist.com
Reply to this comment
Congratulations!
by spm82 May 15, 2007 8:52 AM PDT
You are the first person in America to speak negatively about the president. Way to be a trend-setter.
View reply
How loose is the screw-in-the-head?
by roomancer May 15, 2007 8:42 AM PDT
To insist that someone be imprisoned for life because they may have borrowed a copy of software from a friend for personal use... is a clear sign that the money hungry pigs dont care at all about anything other than the accumulation of more money. Lets say I got a copy of some paint program that is 8 or 9 years old, and I use it for personal use. They could actually claim I had the intention to package and distribute it. But wait! They could say the same thing about a program I paid for. There would be no requirement for proof of anything. Go buy a $10 CD-rom of some cheap game at Walmart. Register that sucker. Now you're on a criminal watchlist because you have someone's intellectual property. Duhhhh... I do believe it is 'reality-check' time for the rich idiots.
Reply to this comment
I Can't Imagine...
by Jane in KC May 15, 2007 8:53 AM PDT
what is going through this person's brain, if anything! I'm a life-long Republican, but this is the stupidest proposal yet. Hopefully it's just more hot air from Washington.
Reply to this comment
 See all 106 Comments >>
advertisement

In the news now

Apple: DRM-free tunes, unibody MacBook Pro

roundup At Macworld, Phil Schiller touts 10 million songs sans DRM, plus 69-cent songs, a unibody 17-inch notebook, iLife updates, and more.


Countdown to CES

special coverage The tech community descends on Las Vegas as the Consumer Electronics Show gets ready to kick off in all its gadgety glory.


About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right